As the Chairman of the House Law Enforcement and Criminal
Justice committee, one of the important issues my committee is addressing in
legislation this year is the regulation of the use of body cameras worn by
police officers. This new and emerging law enforcement tool is being adopted
and implemented in many jurisdictions across the state. However, right now the
regulation of when to use them, how to retain the recordings, and what privacy
standards to use is piecemeal because we lack a an overarching state law on the
issue. Camera recordings are an important part of the justice system.
I believe there are some areas where we want consistent and
uniform policy throughout the state so that each officer and citizen has the
same expectations of how the recordings will be treated and used in criminal or
other proceedings. Not all recording are
critical to save for long periods of time. For instance, recording that fall in
the critical incident category should be saved for a longer amount of time than
recordings of inconsequential interactions.
However, once we set the timelines for each category of recording, those
category times should be consistent statewide. Also, a universal policy on how to treat any
recordings that contain nudity, gore or children is a must. Body cameras are an
important tool for a variety of reasons, but if used incorrectly the tool could
have damaging effects. Privacy of citizens is important and I believe we should error on the side of marking the recordings
private.
There are two different bills that have been proposed to set
these universal laws. The first, HB 300 Body-Worn Cameras for Law Enforcement
by Rep. Dan McCay sets the laws for body cameras in state statute including
items like when to turn the camera off and on, how to announce a camera is in
use, and how to display the camera. The
bill would give some leeway to local community to set some regulations as well.
The second bill, SB 94 Law Enforcement Use of Body Cameras by Sen. Dan Thatcher
would designate the Peace Officer Standards and Training Division (POST) as the
entity to establish and implement statewide guidelines for camera use, length
of film retention, and standard implementation. The reasons why this sponsor
feels designating POST as the entity with the statewide authority is because
this is an area of new and emerging technology that might need updates or
revisions sooner than the annual 45-day legislative session can accommodate. In
addition, the sponsor believes that POST will have more expertise on what types
of situations and realistic expectations a law enforcement officer with a
camera is likely to encounter.
I am confident that as we debate these two bill and consider
that best policy for Utahns, we will find the best way to enact these universal
standards and ensure everyone has the same expectations for body cameras no
matter where in the state they happen to live or travel.
No comments:
Post a Comment